Please upgrade to the latest version of Flash Player.

Click here if you already have Flash Player installed.

Smith, Chapman & Campbell - Orange County, California Business Litigation Attorneys

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Smith, Chapman & Campbell Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

SLAPP: What to Do If You Have Been Sued for Defamation in California

Posted by Bill Chapman on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 @ 05:19 PM
Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

If you have been sued in California for defamation (someone claims that you made a statement of fact about them that hurt their reputation), the first thing you should consider is whether the lawsuit is a "Strategic Lawsuit against Public Policy" (SLAPP). A SLAPP is a lawsuit filed to scare someone from exercising their free speech rights protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution or California Constitution. California Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16(a). The California Anti-SLAPP Statute used to be "construed broadly."

To successfully use this defense, one must show that the speech was intended to address an issue of "public interest." However, the defense does not apply if the allegedly wrongful statements were made "for the purpose of obtaining approval for, promoting, or securing sales releases, or commercial transactions in, the person's goods or services, or the statement or contact was made in the course of delivering the person's goods or services" AND the intended audience was "an actual or potential buyer or customer, or a person likely to repeat the statement to, or otherwise influence, an actual or potential buyer or customer, the statement or conduct arose out of it within the context of a regulatory approval process, proceeding or investigation,..." . California Code Of Civil Procedure §425.17(c)(1) and (2).

If your statements were on topic of public interest and not factual statements intended to prevent a business from selling its goods or services, you may be entitled to file "Special Motion to Strike" to end the lawsuit before any discovery takes place. You must file this motion within 30 days of being served with the lawsuit. Then, the court must decide whether the party who sued you will probably win the lawsuit. If the court determines that the plaintiff is not likely to win the lawsuit, and you will be entitled to your attorneys fees and costs. If the court determines that the plaintiff will likely prevail, the case will go forward. If the court decides that the plaintiff is likely to prevail and that your motion was frivolous or brought slowly to delay the case or harass the other side, the court will order you to pay the attorneys fees and costs of the other side in the case will go forward.

You must carefully evaluate the decision of whether to file a "Special Motion to Strike" under California's Anti-SLAPP statute. Smith, Chapman & Campbell is available to help you make this decision.

 

0 Comments Click here to read/write comments

All Posts

© 2010 www.smithchapman.com | Terms of Use | Login